Mississippi Code
Chapter 17 - Trial
§ 99-17-13. Variance between indictment and proof; amendment of record and indictment; continuance

Whenever, on the trial of an indictment for any offense, there shall appear to be any variance between the statement in the indictment and the evidence offered in proof thereof, in the name of any county, city, town, village, division, or any other place mentioned in such indictment, or in the name or description of any person or body politic or corporate, therein stated or alleged to be the owner of any property, real or personal, which shall form the subject of any offense charged therein, or in the name or description of any person, body politic or corporate, therein stated or alleged to be injured or damaged; or intended to be injured or damaged, by the commission of such offense, or in the Christian name or surname, or both, or other description whatever, of any person whomsoever, therein named or described, or in the ownership of any property named or described therein, or in the description of any property or thing, it shall and may be lawful for the court before which the trial shall be had, if it shall consider such variance not material to the merits of the case, and that the defendant cannot be prejudiced thereby in his defense on the merits, to order such indictment and the record and proceedings in the court to be amended according to the proof, whenever it may be deemed necessary by the court to amend such indictment, record, and proceedings, on such terms as to postponing the trial, to be had before the same or another jury, as the court shall think reasonable. After such amendment, the trial shall proceed in the same manner, and with the same consequences in all respects, as if a variance had not occurred; but if the court shall, on application, refuse a continuance, the defendant may take a bill of exceptions thereto, and assign such refusal for error.

Structure Mississippi Code

Mississippi Code

Title 99 - Criminal Procedure

Chapter 17 - Trial

§ 99-17-1. Indictments to be tried within 270 days of arraignment

§ 99-17-3. Peremptory challenges; number allowed

§ 99-17-5. Peremptory challenges; joint defendant must agree

§ 99-17-7. Interpreters

§ 99-17-9. Trial in the absence of accused

§ 99-17-11. Only two counsel to a side heard

§ 99-17-13. Variance between indictment and proof; amendment of record and indictment; continuance

§ 99-17-15. Variance between indictment and proof; amendment of record and indictment; order for amendment

§ 99-17-17. Joint defendants are competent witnesses for one another in separate trials

§ 99-17-19. Assaults; insulting words admissible

§ 99-17-20. Capital murder or other crimes punishable by death

§ 99-17-21. Bribery; certain proof not necessary

§ 99-17-23. Dueling; offender compelled to testify against another

§ 99-17-25. Gambling and futures contracts; state not confined to proof of single violation

§ 99-17-27. Gambling and futures contracts; witness compelled to testify; immunity granted; penalty for refusing

§ 99-17-29. Lotteries; purchaser of ticket compelled to testify against seller

§ 99-17-31. Offenses affecting legislature; witness denied privilege against self-incrimination

§ 99-17-33. Perjury; no variance between "sworn" and "affirmed."

§ 99-17-35. Instructions to jury

§ 99-17-37. Papers may be carried out by jury

§ 99-17-39. Bills of exceptions; duty of judge to sign

§ 99-17-41. Bills of exceptions; when tendered and signed; incapacity of judge

§ 99-17-43. Bills of exceptions; attorneys may sign if judge refuses

§ 99-17-45. Bills of exception; amendment

§ 99-17-47. New trials; terms directed by court; number limited

§ 99-17-49. New trials; grant or refusal assignable for error