Sec. 5. An investigative demand may not:
(1) contain a requirement that would be unreasonable if contained in a subpoena or subpoena duces tecum issued by a court in a grand jury investigation; or
(2) require the giving of oral testimony, the production of written answers to interrogatories, or the production of documentary material that would be privileged from disclosure if demanded by a subpoena duces tecum issued by a court in aid of a grand jury investigation.
As added by Acts 1982, P.L.20, SEC.5.
Structure Indiana Code
Title 4. State Offices and Administration
Chapter 3. Duties in Civil Actions
4-6-3-2. Direction of Prosecutions Brought in the Name of the State
4-6-3-2.4. Settlement Agreements; Use of Settlement Funds
4-6-3-2.5. Contingency Fee Contracts
4-6-3-3. Investigative Demand; Issuance
4-6-3-4. Investigative Demand; Required Provisions; Sales of Synthetic Drugs
4-6-3-5. Investigative Demand; Prohibited Provisions
4-6-3-6. Application to Enforce Investigative Demand; Procedure; Contempt; Order
4-6-3-6.5. Sanctions for Failure to Comply With Demand
4-6-3-7. Certain Evidence; Admissibility in Criminal Prosecutions
4-6-3-8. Abridgment of Limitations on Self-Incrimination Prohibited
4-6-3-9. Materials Obtained Under Investigative Demand; Confidentiality
4-6-3-10. Documentary Material; Custody, Use, and Preservation