Georgia Code
Article 5 - Contributions
§ 47-23-80. Contributions by Superior Court Judges and District Attorneys; Employer Contributions

History. Code 1981, § 47-23-80 , enacted by Ga. L. 1998, p. 513, § 1; Ga. L. 2005, p. 535, § 33/HB 460; Ga. L. 2009, p. 753, § 17/SB 109; Ga. L. 2010, p. 1207, § 64/SB 436; Ga. L. 2014, p. 223, § 4/HB 843.
The 2009 amendment, effective July 1, 2010, in subsection (a), substituted “Council of Superior Court Judges of Georgia and the Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council of the State of Georgia, as appropriate, are” for “Department of Administrative Services is” throughout, deleted “for the operation of the superior courts of this state” preceding “any required” in the sixth sentence, and deleted “for the operation of superior courts” following “available” in the seventh sentence.
The 2010 amendment, effective July 1, 2010, substituted “The Council of Superior Court Judges of Georgia” for “the Council of Superior Court Judges of Georgia” near the beginning of the last sentence of subsection (a).
The 2014 amendment, effective July 1, 2014, added subsection (e).
Editor’s notes.
Ga. L. 2010, p. 1207, § 1, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: “The intent of this Act is to repeal obsolete and inoperative provisions and to make certain stylistic corrections in Title 47 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. Nothing in this Act shall deny, abridge, increase, renew, revive, or on any way affect any right, benefit, option, credit, or election to which any person was entitled pursuant to such title on June 30, 2010, and the board of trustees of each public retirement system is authorized and directed to provide by regulation for the continuation of any such right, benefit, option, credit, or election not otherwise covered in this Act; provided, however, that any such right, benefit, option, credit, or election shall be subject to the statutory provisions in effect on June 30, 2010.”
Ga. L. 2010, p. 1207, § 67, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: “In the event of an irreconcilable conflict between a provision of Sections 62 through 64 of this Act and a provision of another Act enacted at the 2010 regular session of the General Assembly, the provision of such other Act shall control over this Act to the extent of the conflict.