Source: L. 94: Entire article R&RE, p. 845, § 1, effective January 1, 1995.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former §§ 4-3-116 and 4-3-117 as they existed prior to 1994.
In the case of a check payable to "John Smith," since there are many people in the world named "John Smith" it is not possible to identify the payee of the check unless there is some further identification or the intention of the drawer is determined. Name alone is sufficient under subsection (a), but the intention of the drawer determines which John Smith is the person to whom the check is payable. The same issue is presented in cases of misdescriptions of the payee. The drawer intends to pay a person known to the drawer as John Smith. In fact that person's name is James Smith or John Jones or some other entirely different name. If the check identifies the payee as John Smith, it is nevertheless payable to the person intended by the drawer. That person may indorse the check in either the name John Smith or the person's correct name or in both names. Section 3-204(d). The intent of the drawer is also controlling in fictitious payee cases. Section 3-404(b). The last sentence of subsection (a) refers to rare cases in which the signature of an organization requires more than one signature and the persons signing on behalf of the organization do not all intend the same person as payee. Any person intended by a signer for the organization is the payee and an indorsement by that person is an effective indorsement.
Subsection (b) recognizes the fact that in a large number of cases there is no human signer of an instrument because the instrument, usually a check, is produced by automated means such as a check-writing machine. In that case, the relevant intent is that of the person who supplied the name of the payee. In most cases that person is an employee of the drawer, but in some cases the person could be an outsider who is committing a fraud by introducing names of payees of checks into the system that produces the checks. A check-writing machine is likely to be operated by means of a computer in which is stored information as to name and address of the payee and the amount of the check. Access to the computer may allow production of fraudulent checks without knowledge of the organization that is the issuer of the check. Section 3-404(b) is also concerned with this issue. See Case #4 in Comment 2 to Section 3-404.
The third sentence of subsection (d) is directed to cases in which it is not clear whether an instrument is payable to multiple payees alternatively. In the case of ambiguity persons dealing with the instrument should be able to rely on the indorsement of a single payee. For example, an instrument payable to X and/or Y is treated like an instrument payable to X or Y.
Structure Colorado Code
Title 4 - Uniform Commercial Code
Article 3 - Negotiable Instruments
Part 1 - General Provisions and Definitions
§ 4-3-104. Negotiable Instrument
§ 4-3-105. Issue of Instrument
§ 4-3-106. Unconditional Promise or Order
§ 4-3-107. Instrument Payable in Foreign Money
§ 4-3-108. Payable on Demand or at Definite Time
§ 4-3-109. Payable to Bearer or to Order
§ 4-3-110. Identification of Person to Whom Instrument Is Payable
§ 4-3-114. Contradictory Terms of Instrument
§ 4-3-115. Incomplete Instrument
§ 4-3-116. Joint and Several Liability; Contribution
§ 4-3-117. Other Agreements Affecting Instrument