2021 Oregon Revised Statutes
Chapter 105 - Property Rights
Section 105.148 - Contesting plaintiff’s affidavit or declaration of noncompliance; ex parte review of hearing request; delaying execution upon judgment of restitution.

(b) A court may, as part of the procedure authorized by ORS 105.146 (6), require that a defendant submit a hearing request to the court for ex parte review prior to the defendant’s filing the request with the clerk. If the court provides for ex parte review, the ex parte review must be available every judicial day for appearance by the defendant before the court within the time period between service of the notice of restitution and the date of expiration of the notice of restitution. The notice of restitution must include or have attached to it a description of the requirements for appearing before the court for ex parte review and a copy of the hearing request form. The court may not require that the defendant notify the plaintiff of the defendant’s intention to appear before the court. If, after hearing the defendant at the ex parte review, the court finds that the reasons given by the defendant for opposing the plaintiff’s affidavit or declaration of noncompliance do not relate to the issues listed in ORS 105.149 (2), the court shall deny the request for a hearing.
(2) The clerk shall make available a document providing for a request for hearing by a defendant. The document must be in substantially the following form:
______________________________________________________________________________
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
FOR THE COUNTY OF
_________
Defendant’s Request for Hearing to
Contest an Affidavit or Declaration
of Noncompliance
Case No. _____
Landlord or agent (Plaintiff):
__________________
vs.
Tenant/Occupant (Defendant):
__________________
Address of Property:
__________________
__________________
1. My landlord has filed a statement with the court saying that I have not complied with a court-approved agreement and that as a result my landlord is entitled to possession of the property.
2. I deny the landlord is entitled to possession of the property because (The reason must be one of the following. You must check one or more of these responses and you must explain in section 3.):
_____ a. The landlord is wrong. As explained below, I did comply with the agreement.
_____ b. Before I could comply with the agreement, the landlord was supposed to do what is explained below, which the landlord did not do.
_____ c. The landlord and I changed the agreement and I complied with the agreement as changed. The change we agreed to is explained below.
_____ d. The landlord prevented me from keeping the agreement. The way the landlord did that is explained below.
_____ e. The agreement was not made in good faith as required by ORS 90.130. The lack of good faith is explained below.
_____ f. The portion of the agreement described below was unconscionable as described in ORS 90.135.
_____ g. The landlord is required by law or contract to have good cause to force me to move out and my alleged conduct or performance does not meet the standard of good cause, as explained below.
_____ h. The landlord is claiming I did not pay rent for a period of time following the date of the agreement. I did not pay that rent because I have claims for money against the landlord to offset the rent. Those claims arise from the landlord’s violation of the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act or the rental agreement since the date of the court order and are explained below.
3. Here is my explanation for the reason or reasons checked above:
___________________________
___________________________
___________________________
4. I understand that if I lose in court, I may be responsible for the landlord’s costs, disbursements, any attorney fees and a prevailing party fee.
I hereby declare that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief, and that I understand it is made for use as evidence in court and is subject to penalty for perjury.
Date: ________
______________________________________________________________________________
(3) As an alternative to the document described in subsection (2) of this section, a defendant may request a hearing by use of a notarized affidavit. [2001 c.596 §11 (105.146, 105.148 and 105.149 enacted in lieu of 105.147); 2003 c.378 §24; 2005 c.391 §35; 2007 c.508 §17]
Note: See note under 105.146.

Structure 2021 Oregon Revised Statutes