(a) In generalDamages awarded in any Y2K action shall exclude compensation for damages the plaintiff could reasonably have avoided in light of any disclosure or other information of which the plaintiff was, or reasonably should have been, aware, including information made available by the defendant to purchasers or users of the defendant’s product or services concerning means of remedying or avoiding the Y2K failure involved in the action.
(b) Preservation of existing lawThe duty imposed by this section is in addition to any duty to mitigate imposed by State law.
(c) Exception for intentional fraudSubsection (a) does not apply to damages suffered by reason of the plaintiff’s justifiable reliance upon an affirmative material misrepresentation by the defendant, made by the defendant with actual knowledge of its falsity, concerning the potential for Y2K failure of the device or system used or sold by the defendant that experienced the Y2K failure alleged to have caused the plaintiff’s harm.
Structure US Code
CHAPTER 92— YEAR 2000 COMPUTER DATE CHANGE
§ 6603. Application of chapter
§ 6604. Punitive damages limitations
§ 6605. Proportionate liability
§ 6609. Application of existing impossibility or commercial impracticability doctrines
§ 6610. Damages limitation by contract
§ 6611. Damages in tort claims
§ 6612. State of mind; bystander liability; control
§ 6613. Appointment of special masters or magistrate judges for Y2K actions
§ 6614. Y2K actions as class actions
§ 6615. Applicability of State law
§ 6616. Admissible evidence ultimate issue in State courts
§ 6617. Suspension of penalties for certain year 2000 failures by small business concerns