(1) the prosecution has established beyond a reasonable doubt that the alleged conduct constituting the offense was committed; and
(2) the defense has established by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant was insane at the time of the alleged conduct.
(b) The parties may, with the consent of the judge, agree to both:
(1) dismissal of the indictment or information on the ground that the defendant was insane; and
(2) entry of a judgment of dismissal due to the defendant's insanity.
(c) An entry of judgment under Subsection (b)(2) has the same effect as a judgment stating that the defendant has been found not guilty by reason of insanity.
Added by Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 831 (S.B. 837), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2005.
Structure Texas Statutes
Title 1 - Code of Criminal Procedure
Chapter 46C - Insanity Defense
Subchapter D. Determination of Issue of Defendant's Sanity
Article 46C.151. Determination of Sanity Issue by Jury
Article 46C.152. Determination of Sanity Issue by Judge
Article 46C.153. General Provisions Relating to Determination of Sanity Issue by Judge or Jury
Article 46C.154. Informing Jury Regarding Consequences of Acquittal
Article 46C.155. Finding of Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity Considered Acquittal
Article 46C.157. Determination Regarding Dangerous Conduct of Acquitted Person
Article 46C.158. Continuing Jurisdiction of Dangerous Acquitted Person
Article 46C.159. Proceedings Regarding Nondangerous Acquitted Person