The General Assembly finds that a procedure that allows a plaintiff to obtain sweeping injunctive relief without giving to each defendant notice of and a hearing based wholly or partly on examination and cross-examination of witnesses in open court, rather than on affidavits alone, is peculiarly subject to abuse in later litigation because:
(1) injunctive relief necessarily alters, rather than maintains, the status quo;
(2) determination of issues of veracity and of probability of fact from affidavits of the opposing parties that are contradictory and, under the circumstances, untrustworthy rather than from oral examination in open court is subject to grave error;
(3) erroneous issuance of injunctive relief usually is irreparable to the defendant; and
(4) delay incident to appeals frequently makes ultimate correction of error unavailing in a particular case.
Structure Maryland Statutes
Title 4 - Bargaining Representatives; Labor Disputes
Part III - Restrictions on Injunctive Relief
Section 4-310 - Labor Dispute Case
Section 4-311 - Legislative Findings and Policy
Section 4-312 - Construction of Part
Section 4-313 - Failure of Plaintiff to Fulfill Obligations
Section 4-314 - Temporary and Permanent Injunctions
Section 4-315 - Temporary Restraining Orders