§1702. Criteria for imposing sentencing alternative that includes fine
1. Consideration of financial capacity to pay and financial burden. In determining the amount of a fine, unless the fine amount is mandatory, and in determining the method of payment of a fine, the court shall take into account the present and future financial capacity of the convicted person to pay the fine and the nature of the financial burden that payment of the fine will impose on the person or a dependent, if any, of the person.
[PL 2019, c. 113, Pt. A, §2 (NEW).]
2. Burden of proving financial hardship or incapacity to pay. A convicted person who asserts a present or future incapacity to pay a fine or asserts that the fine will cause an excessive financial hardship on the person or on a dependent of the person has the burden of proving the incapacity or excessive hardship by a preponderance of the evidence. On appeal of a sentencing alternative involving a fine, the person has the burden of demonstrating that the incapacity or excessive financial hardship was proven as a matter of law.
[PL 2019, c. 113, Pt. A, §2 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 2019, c. 113, Pt. A, §2 (NEW).
Structure Maine Revised Statutes
TITLE 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE
Chapter 65: FINES, FEES, ASSESSMENTS AND SURCHARGES
17-A §1701. Definite fine amount required
17-A §1702. Criteria for imposing sentencing alternative that includes fine
17-A §1703. Use of fine relative to individuals
17-A §1704. Maximum fine amounts authorized for convicted individuals
17-A §1705. Maximum fine amounts authorized for convicted organizations
17-A §1706. Exceptions to maximum fine amounts
17-A §1707. Multiple fines imposed on convicted person
17-A §1708. Time and method of payment of fines imposed on convicted person
17-A §1709. Post-conviction relief invalidating conviction; potential return of fine payments
17-A §1710. Modification of payment of fine
17-A §1712. Deposit of certain fines in Maine Military Family Relief Fund