Indiana Code
Chapter 2. Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act
32-18-2-14. Transfers Voidable as to Present and Future Creditors; Debtor's Actual Intent; Transfer Made Without Receipt of Equivalent Value in Exchange; Factors in Determining Actual Intent; Creditor's Burden of Proof

Sec. 14. (a) A transfer made or an obligation incurred by a debtor is voidable as to a creditor, whether the creditor's claim arose before or after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred, if the debtor made the transfer or incurred the obligation:
(1) with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any creditor of the debtor; or
(2) without receiving a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the transfer or obligation, and the debtor:
(A) was engaged or was about to engage in a business or a transaction for which the remaining assets of the debtor were unreasonably small in relation to the business or transaction; or
(B) intended to incur or believed or reasonably should have believed that the debtor would incur debts beyond the debtor's ability to pay as the debts became due.
(b) In determining actual intent under subsection (a)(1), consideration may be given, among other factors, to whether:
(1) the debtor retained possession or control of the property transferred after the transfer;
(2) the transfer or obligation was disclosed or concealed;
(3) before the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred, the debtor had been sued or threatened with suit;
(4) the transfer was of substantially all the debtor's assets;
(5) the debtor absconded;
(6) the debtor removed or concealed assets;
(7) the value of the consideration received by the debtor was reasonably equivalent to the value of the asset transferred or the amount of the obligation incurred;
(8) the debtor was insolvent or became insolvent shortly after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred; and
(9) the transfer occurred shortly before or shortly after a substantial debt was incurred.
(c) A creditor making a claim for relief under this section has the burden of proving the elements of the claim for relief by a preponderance of the evidence.
[Pre-2002 Recodification Citation: 32-2-7-14.]
As added by P.L.2-2002, SEC.3. Amended by P.L.61-2017, SEC.13.