Georgia Code
Part 7 - Superior Court Judges, District Attorneys, Assistant District Attorneys, Employees of the Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council
§ 47-2-260. Continuation of Membership, Rights, and Benefits of Judges of Superior Courts and District Attorneys; Notice of Election to Continue Membership; Contributions

History. Ga. L. 1969, p. 829, § 1; Ga. L. 1989, p. 347, § 1; Ga. L. 1993, p. 1402, § 11; Ga. L. 1998, p. 513, § 7; Ga. L. 2009, p. 753, § 1/SB 109; Ga. L. 2010, p. 1207, § 64/SB 436.
The 2009 amendment, effective July 1, 2010, in the middle of the first sentence of subsection (b) and the middle of subsection (c), substituted “Council of Superior Court Judges of Georgia or the Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council of the State of Georgia, as appropriate,” for “Department of Administrative Services”; and, in subsection (d), substituted “Council of Superior Court Judges of Georgia and the Prosecuting Attorney’s Council of the State of Georgia are” for “Department of Administrative Services is” near the beginning.
The 2010 amendment, effective July 1, 2010, substituted “The Council” for “the Council” in subsections (b) and (c).
Editor’s notes.
Ga. L. 2010, p. 1207, § 1, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: “The intent of this Act is to repeal obsolete and inoperative provisions and to make certain stylistic corrections in Title 47 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. Nothing in this Act shall deny, abridge, increase, renew, revive, or on any way affect any right, benefit, option, credit, or election to which any person was entitled pursuant to such title on June 30, 2010, and the board of trustees of each public retirement system is authorized and directed to provide by regulation for the continuation of any such right, benefit, option, credit, or election not otherwise covered in this Act; provided, however, that any such right, benefit, option, credit, or election shall be subject to the statutory provisions in effect on June 30, 2010.”
Ga. L. 2010, p. 1207, § 67, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: “In the event of an irreconcilable conflict between a provision of Sections 62 through 64 of this Act and a provision of another Act enacted at the 2010 regular session of the General Assembly, the provision of such other Act shall control over this Act to the extent of the conflict.