Georgia Code
Part 3 - Enforcement of Instruments
§ 11-3-302. Holder in Due Course

History. Code 1981, § 11-3-302 , enacted by Ga. L. 1996, p. 1306, § 3.
Law reviews.
For comment on Pendley v. Credit Equip. Corp., 92 Ga. App. 658 , 89 S.E.2d 567 (1955), see 18 Ga. B.J. 495 (1956).
For comment on Geiger Fin. Co. v. Graham, 123 Ga. App. 771 , 182 S.E.2d 521 (1971), see 8 Ga. St. B.J. 400 (1972).
For note, “Pyramid Marketing Plans and Consumer Protection: State and Federal Regulation,” see 21 J. of Pub. L. 445 (1972).
For article supporting the retention of waiver of defense clauses in credit card agreements, see 10 Ga. St. B.J. 17 (1973).
For comment on Perini Corp. v. First Nat’l Bank, 553 F.2d 398 (5th Cir. 1977), see 27 Emory L.J. 393 (1978).
For note discussing whether a holder in due course takes free of claims of violations of the usury laws, see 12 Ga. L. Rev. 814 (1978).
For article discussing judicial activism in cases involving claims and defenses under the Uniform Commercial Code, see 17 Ga. L. Rev. 569 (1983).
For note, “Negotiable Promissory Notes Containing Time and Demand Provisions: The Need for Consistent Interpretation,” see 19 Ga. L. Rev. 717 (1984).
For article, “The Holder in Due Course Doctrine as a Default Rule,” see 32 Ga. L. Rev. 783 (1998).

Structure Georgia Code