It is recognized by the general assembly that the doctrine of sovereign immunity, whereunder the state and its political subdivisions are often immune from suit for injury suffered by private persons, is, in some instances, an inequitable doctrine. The general assembly also recognizes that the supreme court has abrogated the doctrine of sovereign immunity effective July 1, 1972, and that thereafter the doctrine shall be recognized only to such extent as may be provided by statute. The general assembly also recognizes that the state and its political subdivisions provide essential public services and functions and that unlimited liability could disrupt or make prohibitively expensive the provision of such essential public services and functions. The general assembly further recognizes that the taxpayers would ultimately bear the fiscal burdens of unlimited liability and that limitations on the liability of public entities and public employees are necessary in order to protect the taxpayers against excessive fiscal burdens. It is also recognized that public employees, whether elected or appointed, should be provided with protection from unlimited liability so that such public employees are not discouraged from providing the services or functions required by the citizens or from exercising the powers authorized or required by law. It is further recognized that the state, its political subdivisions, and the public employees of such public entities, by virtue of the services and functions provided, the powers exercised, and the consequences of unlimited liability to the governmental process, should be liable for their actions and those of their agents only to such an extent and subject to such conditions as are provided by this article. The general assembly also recognizes the desirability of including within one article all the circumstances under which the state, any of its political subdivisions, or the public employees of such public entities may be liable in actions which lie in tort or could lie in tort regardless of whether that may be the type of action or the form of relief chosen by a claimant and that the distinction for liability purposes between governmental and proprietary functions should be abolished.
Source: L. 71: p. 1204, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 130-11-2. L. 79: Entire section amended, p. 862, § 1, effective July 1. L. 86: Entire section amended, p. 873, § 1, effective July 1.
Structure Colorado Code
Article 10 - Governmental Immunity
§ 24-10-102. Declaration of Policy
§ 24-10-104. Waiver of Sovereign Immunity
§ 24-10-105. Prior Waiver of Immunity - Effect - Indirect Claims Not Separate
§ 24-10-106. Immunity and Partial Waiver
§ 24-10-107. Determination of Liability
§ 24-10-108. Sovereign Immunity a Bar
§ 24-10-109. Notice Required - Contents - to Whom Given - Limitations
§ 24-10-111. Judgment Against Public Entity or Public Employee - Effect
§ 24-10-112. Compromise of Claims - Settlement of Actions
§ 24-10-113. Payment of Judgments
§ 24-10-113.5. Attorney General to Notify General Assembly
§ 24-10-114.5. Limitation on Attorney Fees in Class Action Litigation
§ 24-10-115. Authority for Public Entities Other Than the State to Obtain Insurance
§ 24-10-115.5. Authority for Public Entities to Pool Insurance Coverage
§ 24-10-116. State Required to Obtain Insurance
§ 24-10-117. Execution and Attachment Not to Issue
§ 24-10-118. Actions Against Public Employees - Requirements and Limitations
§ 24-10-119. Applicability of Article to Claims Under Federal Law