Source: L. 2003: Entire section added, p. 1262, § 42, effective July 1, 2004. L. 2015: Entire part amended, (HB 15-1198), ch. 173, p. 561, § 31, effective July 1.
COMMENT
Subsection (a) provides that a state tribunal may modify a foreign child-support order, other than a Convention order, when the foreign issuing tribunal lacks or refuses to exercise jurisdiction to modify its order. The standard example cited for the necessity of this special rule involved the conundrum posed when an obligor has moved to the responding state from the issuing country and the law of that country requires both parties to be physically present at a hearing before the tribunal in order to sustain a modification of child support. In that circumstance, the foreign issuing tribunal is unable to exercise jurisdiction to modify under its law. Ordinarily, under Section 611 the responding state tribunal is not authorized to issue a new order, in effect modifying the foreign support order, because the child or the obligee continues to reside in the issuing country. To remedy the perceived inequity in such a fact situation, this section provides an exception to the rule of Section 611. If both parties are subject to the personal jurisdiction of a state by the obligee's submission and the obligor's residence, or other grounds under Section 201, the responding state tribunal may modify the foreign child-support order. Modification of a Convention order is governed by Section 711.
The ability of a state tribunal to modify when the foreign country refuses to exercise its jurisdiction should be invoked with circumspection, as there may be a cogent reason for such refusal. Note, Section 317 empowers tribunals to communicate regarding this issue, rather than rely upon representations of one or more of the parties.
Subsection (b) states that if a new order is issued under subsection (a), it becomes the UIFSA controlling order insofar as other states are concerned. Obviously this act cannot dictate the same result to the issuing foreign tribunal, although it seems highly likely that either through child-based jurisdiction or an action filed by the obligee recognition by the foreign tribunal will occur.
Related to Convention: art. 18. Limit on proceedings.
Structure Colorado Code
Article 5 - Uniform Interstate Family Support Act
Part 6 - Registration, Enforcement, and Modification of Support Order
§ 14-5-601. Registration of Order for Enforcement
§ 14-5-602. Procedure to Register Order for Enforcement
§ 14-5-603. Effect of Registration for Enforcement
§ 14-5-605. Notice of Registration of Order
§ 14-5-606. Procedure to Contest Validity or Enforcement of Registered Support Order
§ 14-5-607. Contest of Registration or Enforcement
§ 14-5-609. Procedure to Register Child Support Order of Another State for Modification
§ 14-5-610. Effect of Registration for Modification
§ 14-5-611. Modification of Child Support Order of Another State
§ 14-5-612. Recognition of Order Modified in Another State
§ 14-5-614. Notice to Issuing Tribunal of Modification
§ 14-5-615. Jurisdiction to Modify Child Support Order of Foreign Country
§ 14-5-616. Procedure to Register Child Support Order of Foreign Country for Modification